Bo and Noah discuss the latter’s critique of an article, published in the Hastings Center Report, which argued that hereditarian research is “abhorrent”.
Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction and Podcast Overview
00:25 Discussing the Article: Is Hereditarian Research Abhorrent?
01:06 Critique of the Hastings Center Report
02:54 Rebuttal to the New Paper on Hereditarian Research
03:12 Debating the Use of the Term 'Abhorrent'
06:51 Analyzing the Article's Opening and Eugenics Conference
12:44 Criticism of Academic Bias and Self-Publishing
18:59 The Harm vs. Value Debate in Scientific Research
23:04 Case Study: Genomic Race Science
28:42 Speculative Harms and Real-World Implications
33:09 Critique of Genomic Race Science
34:04 Questioning the Claims of Harm
37:32 Potential Benefits of Hereditarian Research
41:53 Historical Context and High-Achieving Minorities
49:24 Admixture Studies and Genetic Ancestry
54:37 Debating the Value of Hereditarian Research
01:02:43 Conclusion and Final Thoughts
Watch the full video below:
Listen to this episode with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Aporia to listen to this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.