Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Razib Khan's avatar

don't have time to read the whole thing, but this really incorrect thing jumped out at me: "if Frank Salter’s volume On Genetic Interests is correct. According to Salter, studies have found that no more than 20% of European genetic material is derived from Near Eastern infusions"

salter was writing 20 years ago. our understanding of the genetic origins of europeans have been radically revolutionized in the last generation (salter's assertion is "not even wrong").

if you are going to have someone write about "white identity" maybe have them be at least cursorily fluent in the latest archeogenetics. we don't need to speculate, we have facts. if you can't even get the biological basics correct, who cares about the rest? (or maybe not, it's all cultural identity? idk)

Expand full comment
siberiancat's avatar

Russian cultural differences mainly stem from the fact that it is a frontier Empire. If you dig deeper, all the epic Russian myths are about the kings and their heroic warriors.

Mongols have left practically zero genetic trace in the Russian populace. Not much cultural imprint, too.

However being a frontier state, and being a subject of constant raids by Tatars (~1.5 million of Eastern Slavs were captured and enslaved) shaped the national character. As influences go, Poland, Eastern Roman Empire and Iran had more. Why Iran – look at the National Armory exposition.

Authoritarianism of the modern Russia is grossly exagerrated here. Authoritarism in historical Europe is conversely ignored.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts