28 Comments

I would love to be impressed - heartened - by this analysis and action plan. But it so hopelessly underestimated the scale of the task. Some reality here:

1) it's taken conservative politicians (and most thinkers) an extraordinary long time (50 years) to get the measure of the power of an (overwhelmingly leftist) academia to effectively emasculate our supposedly pluralist democracy. To finally wake up to it only when it is way too late. The leftist academia meanwhile has been churning out entire generations of ambitious young professionals, managers and administrators (let alone BBC-type arts and media leftist clones) sheep-dipped in its bogus 'social justice' vanities and delicious victimhood cults. What now do you hope to do about all these people? Somehow 're-educate' them. Of course not.

2) so any return to sanity in our culture will now take generations as well.

3) 'successes' (in the UK at least) are delusory. The UK has been in the vanguard of wokeness etc so much so that (unlike America) it barely has any conservative political constituency left now.

The only real (slim) hope is that the arts, humanities and social 'sciences' parts of our tertiary education institutions will self-destruct their useless narcissistic/virtue signalling selves. If anyone doubts the scale of the problem, read this: https://grahamcunningham.substack.com/p/how-diversity-narrows-the-mind

Expand full comment

At least here in America, it was obvious by at least the late 90s with the Sokal Hoax that the universities were harboring and nurturing a malevolent beast called Critical Studies, which was pumping out a toxic flood of dishonest pesudoscholarship that was all more or less old Marxist dogma repackaged in new shinier bottles. (I won't even get to the prose style (!!), which was to writing what chewing glass is to dinner.) And everyone from Alan Bloom to Robert Hughes to Eric Hoffer and Saul Bellow were sounding the alarm, yet as they were all pelted with bigotry accusations (sound familiar?), everyone just agreed to look the other way.

Thus we had found ourselves in an odd spot: a country that was actively subsidizing the books and ideas (and lives) of people who hated that country, its citizens and history, and who were working one brain at a time to destabilize that country and society, by pouring foul sludge on our entire history and culture.

But as the choice was to either fight them and be attacked as both bigots and opponents of academic freedom, the response instead was a wave of rationalization: oh those crazy kids on campus, wait till they hit the real world! (people still said this even 5 years ago).

But the real world was securalizing, destabilizing, undergoing rapid churn, and as all the old belief systems keeled over from senescence, a new stronger state-subsidized belief system rose from the ashes, maximally designed to cater to the precious feelings and emotional needs of our deracinated youth.

Whatever happens to academia is sort of besides the point now, an entire generation (at least the educated urbanites) has been indocrinated in a rigid, punitive mashup of Marxism and Protestantism, designed to tear down all that came before it in the name of Justice and Equality.

The time to have this fight was at least 2 decades ago. Now we're like Julian the Apostate hoping to resurrect the pagan gods, but the sun has set on the old world....

Expand full comment

Yes to all that. I can empathize to some extent with the frustration of those who might say (in response to both my comment and yours) "So what's your solution then?" We in the West have been schooled into an expectation that there is a political solution to every social problem. My own answer would be to observe that our post-war democratic pluralism has now accumulated problems to which it has no credible solution and so we must wait for some new political arrangements to emerge - whatever these may be.

Expand full comment

"our post-war democratic pluralism has now accumulated problems to which it has no credible solution and so we must wait for some new political arrangements to emerge" !!

I read this somewhere recently: "Every revolutionary change in the means of communication is followed by a change in the entire structure of society."

We are living thru upheavals similar to what the Gutenberg press did to 15th/16th century Europe. All settled arrangements, beliefs, etc will be torn up and the world will be reconfigured. This will take much longer than our personal lifespans.

Cheers!

Expand full comment

Fantastic piece. I strongly believe that to reform universities we need to combine the best of new right, libertarian, and classical approaches to education. One thing I would like to see, in addition to what you discussed, is greater consideration of which degrees are worth funding at all, and for how many. Not simply as a matter of content, but as a matter of predation. Ryerson, where I attended, has an English BA that students graduate from with little practical skill - all they’re taught is how to analyze books, little in the way of editing, publishing, copywriting, etc. Most masters degrees are well known scams that disproportionately attract international students or those who don’t know what to do with their lives. I’m by no means opposed to people taking soft subjects but those who do should be getting a serious education, and whoever’s job it is to ensure that, maybe the accreditation agencies, has totally looked the other way.

Expand full comment

And by 'analyze' books of course is meant to deconstruct them according to the precepts of critical theory. Certainly they never learn how to construct narratives - witness the hamfisted abominations emanating from the Hollywood writing teams.

I've run into numerous graduates of literature programs who make basic mistakes in grammar and spelling, and seem perfectly incapable of writing with either clarity or art. Lit programs are not the only scam being run, but they are an especially obvious one.

Expand full comment

So, you're saying replace academic study with trade or business schools?

Expand full comment

Whether universities are the capstone in a progressive education or not, this doesn't consider why almost 40% of UK students need to attend full time tertiary education. Why only 30% will fully repay fees (covered by UK taxpayers) or why we need 250k activist-academics to be employed full time. Only 15% attended in the 1980s, 25% 1990s. Yes to higher ed for brightest. Yes to opinion diversity. No to degree factories and a backdoor immigration channel. Let's offer current fee rates for the best students and in vocational nationally important career paths. Let universities set their fees (without any state underpinning) for the rest. Let nature take its course and sub-standard universities adapt or perish.

Expand full comment

Precisely. The overwhelming majority should be learning on the job or going through an apprenticeship. Most do not benefit from university and are actively harmed by it.

Expand full comment

In an era of MOOCS (massive open online courses) helped by online learning during Covid and the growth of modular degrees, there's no reason why online and distance learning can't also fill in learning objectives. Mostly for second order students interested in continuing their education, whilst working. As night schools used to do before them. Or even institutions such as Birkbeck, where Kaufmann also teaches. We're told that employers need to bring in migrants because of economic demands, but we have 2.9 million students in tertiary education. Most of whom will leave owing £45,000 and a taxpayer backstop expected to cover the difference. It's ludicrous. It only benefits a hostile academic class.

Expand full comment

Very disappointing, totally inadequate. More boomers with more boomer solutions, you do not reform a bureaucracy, you start from scratch. "I'm going to cut off the heads of the Hydra I want cut off", no sonny boy, you have to go for the heart. Besides in SSH methodology is shit, the whole set of fields need to be created from scratch with far higher standards, proper understanding of statistics i.e. 3 years of study min from the math department and those in the field need to have a lot more intellectual humility when it comes to what one can ever hope to show.

The correct answer is defunding.

Expand full comment

Mild cost cutting measures or mild reforms are a false dichotomy - there are other options. The devastation of the monasteries, for example. The universities are producing nothing of value, and are extracting a great deal of value from society. They have become millstones around our necks, generating mountains of tendentious nonsense. We could take a page from Henry VIII - abolish them, appropriate their endowments, and use the windfall to pay off the debts inflicted on their hapless graduates.

That may seem drastic. However. Another think tank or regulatory imposition isn't going to cut it. Neither is eliminating an administrative department here and there. California banned affirmative action years ago, yet the universities there imputedently continue to be among the most biased in the country. Neither professors nor admin care about the law. They do not care about debate. They do not even care about basic epistemic standards. The institutions are so thoroughly staffed by these enemies of civilization that there is no hope of reform.

Therefore fire them all, and trust that God will know his own. Burn the ivory towers to the ground, salt the earth on which the ashes stand, and use the plunder and whatever refugees are salvageable to start fresh.

Expand full comment

Don't you think it's at least possible that the dissolution of the monasteries is in fact what is going on? Like they're being sacked for value already, just not in the medieval form of actually tearing them down and carting off their art and jeweled reliquaries and precious textiles and endowments and lands?

But it's like a 21st century financialized verson of the dissolution of the monasteries? Who would be the Cromwell of it... McKinsey or something.

Expand full comment

I don't think that's what's going on at all, simply because vast wealth continues to flow through them. You could certainly argue that this wealth is rendering them unfit for purpose by subverting them towards ends other than their own, hollowing them out and turning them into real estate scams with a thin facade of scholarish appearance. But that's similar to what happened with the monasteries before the Reformation: they'd become cynical centers of wealth and power which engaged their spiritual responsibilities merely to keep up appearances.

Expand full comment

Not exactly the same thing, agreed. But there is a lot of jiggery pokery in university financing, quite a bit of it attached to the neverending building booms on all uni campuses everywhere. So this is obviously the reverse of literally tearing down. But just as Cromwell cast his gaze over England and thought: where is the money at? And then hoovered it up from monasteries in the name of reform / building Christianity back better / etc, today's Cromwell equivalents are turning a similarly avaricious gaze on healthcare and higher ed

Expand full comment

I'm inclined to agree. This whole idea of leveraging the non-discrimination framework of civil rights law to buttress 'political diversity' is doomed to failure, as I see it, since legitimising the moral framework of the civil rights movement itself makes political debate on the topics of real consequence virtually impossible.

Burn it down. I will be there with marshmallows.

Expand full comment

We can encourage DEI debates.

Expand full comment

The 'woke' won't debate. They see the world purely in terms of power relations, and their job is to take absolute power and crush all dissent.

Expand full comment

Let us know when you find woke academics willing to debate.

Expand full comment

The woke are on the payroll. They must debate if asked by their superiors.

Expand full comment

What you call "left wing" is shorthand for "PMC" and universities are by definition the incubator of the professional managerial class and its values. In fact, for a talented kid not hailing from a PMC background, perhaps the main function of the university is as a place to learn those values.

Hence, any attempt to reform universities without changing economic and class relations is futile.

Expand full comment

We've been hearing similar calls to remake universities in a more conservative-friendly, or at least less stridently PMC image, going back at least to the 1990s. I recall a hilariously unrealistic cartoon in "The American Spectator" trying to depict Newt Gingrich and a Team R elephant as hipsters. The effect was as contrived and hokey as if your mother were to watch a couple of YouTube videos and affect youth slang in order to better relate to her grandkittens.

"What's up, fellow kids?"

Expand full comment

DEI requires young faculty to publicly assert their support of DEI., does it not? This trains young people to lie.

Expand full comment

Excellent article! Although I do wish people would stop using words like "Right" and "Conservative" in the sense of "people who, deep down, want to protect my culture, my identity, and my way of life."

Most Conservative politicians don't have a political philosophy. They do whatever their donors want. Right now, those donors want to drive economic growth by increasing population growth through mass immigration -- even if that means lower GDP per capita, housing shortages, and lower wages for most working people. Actually, the last two are a feature and not a bug.

Yes, some Conservative politicians have a political philosophy. It's a kind of libertarian globalism in which people are interchangeable units of production and consumption in a global marketplace. Things like "culture," "identity," and "way of life" have no meaning for them. Those entities don't exist in their model of reality.

You can try telling Conservative politicians that wealth is most efficiently created in high-trust cultures and that such cultures are a minority on this planet. If we destroy those cultures, we will kill the goose that laid the golden egg. We will all be poorer.

You can try telling them that. At best, they will respond with a blank stare. At worst, the name-calling will begin.

All that being said, there is room for optimism. I would simply say that political lobbying should not be confined to "Conservatives." It should be aimed at everyone, including people who self-identify as "woke" and who, initially, may seem hostile. Woke ideology is a lake a thousand miles wide and two inches deep. It is sustained largely by group conformity and ... by corporate donations.

Expand full comment

I urge the provost to require a debate like they did at MIT

Expand full comment

The way forward is to abjure easy and satisfying conservative reflexes that involve tinkering with the current system. Instead, we should completely remove government involvement from university education. https://jclester.substack.com/p/the-augean-stables-of-academe

Expand full comment

This article is full of begs-the-question. For example, "abolish DEI". Great. Now tell us how to do that.

Expand full comment

I like points 1 and 2, with the exception that I'd keep full academic freedom protections for department heads and have "obligatory institutional neutrality" start only at the dean / vice dean level and above.

Points 3 and 4 seem to me disastrous. Hiring people on the basis of "I promise I am a conservative" is as objectionable as hiring them on the basis of "I promise fealty to EDI". Ditto regarding building centres within universities that have politically-based carve outs from the rules that should apply to everyone ("over there you devote yourself to truth, over here we devote ourselves to Hayek").

They are also rules that build losing into your strategy ("of course we'll always be on the back foot, so we need special protections"). I mean isn't that the, um, soft bigotry of, er, low expectations?

If you want the university back you have to build a plan for really getting it back, not a plan that is like "the university, now with safe spaces for conservatives too"

Expand full comment