
The Genius of Galton | Gavan Tredoux
Why is one of the most important scientists in history so shunned? What did he actually think about race and eugenics? How much do we owe to his once-in-a-generation mind?
Gavan Tredoux is Chief Technical Officer at Traitwell. Previously he was a Principal Data Scientist at Bayer and a Senior Scientist at Xerox PARC. A Fellow of the Royal Anthropological Institute, he is the author of Comrade Haldane is Too Busy to Go on Holiday: the Genius Who Spied for Stalin (Encounter: 2018), about JBS Haldane. His Book of Burtoniana (burtoniana.org, 2016) collects the correspondence of Captain Sir Richard Francis Burton (1821-1890) in 4 volumes. He is currently in the final stages of proofing his biography, Francis Galton: a Lifetime of Exploration (in 2 volumes with 7 supplements). He created and maintains galton.org, containing the complete works of Francis Galton (1822-1911), including all his published memoirs. Likewise, his burtoniana.org collects Captain Sir Richard Francis Burton. Sometimes he blogs over at renostercations but more often tweets @gtredoux.
Without doubt, this is one of our most educational and fascinating podcasts so far. We hope you enjoy.
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
1:33 How Gavan got interested in Galton
10:30 Why is there not more interest in Galton?
13:40 Will Darwin go the way of Galton?
15:38 What were Galton’s major accomplishments in psychology and genetics?
23:52 Is the field embarrassed by Galton?
27:40 What was Galton’s idea of race?
33:00 Was Galton racist?
35:48 How Galton thought about heritability
45:11 What about the environment?
51:40 Eugenics
1:04:15 What should Galton’s legacy be?
1:07:20 Bonus questions preview
Watch the conversation below:
The Genius of Galton | Gavan Tredoux
My favourite thought experiment for a blank-slater is to ask if they had to go through IVF to produce a child, would they have a preference for sperm donation from an ex-olympian Harvard professor and philanthropist or a random man's sperm, if I could guarantee no genetic pathology on screening both samples.
May we aspire to be as prominent and trailblazing as Galton