Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hector Vilena's avatar

Not an expert on this topic at all, but that article from the "Open Chemical Physics Journal" is suspect. A quick Google search about the journal (which I had never heard of) suggests that it's a predatory, "open access" journal, which I think means there is no peer review. It's just pay to play.

Furthermore, most of the authors aren't academics. One guy lists his affiliation as BYU Dept of Physics, but when you search the dept of Physics, there's no listing for him. You then find out he was a lab manager there. Most of the other guys have affiliations which seem to be made-up names.

Another analysis (by a PhD) presented at a mainstream science conference seems to debunk their claims. http://aneta.org/911experiments_com/millette/paper/index.htm

I do not have the expertise to read this. I'd be curious if there is any similar published result by reputable, mainstream academic scientists. Or if the conspiracy theory is so deep that the deep state threatens all these academics with their lives so they can't publish the truth?

Expand full comment
Zero Contradictions's avatar

I used to believe this conspiracy theory myself, but I changed my mind after watching the Chris Mohr vs Richard Gage debate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2dEVikWEbU

Roughly two-thirds of the people who watched the debate in the audience thought that Chris Mohr's arguments were persuasive. Richard Gage filmed the debate on video, but he never released the video since most people didn't find arguments very convincing against his opponent. That's very telling, but at least we have the audio from the debate.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts