I too dislike the deep roots literature for thorny methodological reasons, but I’m not enthused by the Kelly paper anymore. Voth convincingly eviscerated it.
I read Voth's article in a book. I did not mention it because I would then have to show why it is a good critique of Kelly and why despite its concerns the deep roots is still flawed. I don't know how many people would follow read that. I have read your papers on immigration
South Korea was th a poor part of the Korean peninsula and suffered harsh treatment under the Japanese colonists in the 1st half of the 20th century. It was then utterly destroyed during the Korean War. 2 generations later it was one of the richest countries in the world.
I too dislike the deep roots literature for thorny methodological reasons, but I’m not enthused by the Kelly paper anymore. Voth convincingly eviscerated it.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128158746000150
I read Voth's article in a book. I did not mention it because I would then have to show why it is a good critique of Kelly and why despite its concerns the deep roots is still flawed. I don't know how many people would follow read that. I have read your papers on immigration
South Korea was th a poor part of the Korean peninsula and suffered harsh treatment under the Japanese colonists in the 1st half of the 20th century. It was then utterly destroyed during the Korean War. 2 generations later it was one of the richest countries in the world.