Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrea Rodolfo Nadia's avatar

As a fellow Italian, I can't help finding the article quite flattering, though maybe a little self-indulgent.

Yet I am obliged to clarify we didn't really invent pasta: it came to us from China and we spread it worldwide with our own tweaks to the recipe.

Much like Covid!

Expand full comment
Peter Frost's avatar

Congratulations! We should have a name for this use of aDNA to reconstruct human cognitive evolution.

Your findings are consistent with the ancient view that intelligence was higher at medium latitudes and lower in the "cold north" and the "hot south." This view was propounded by a number of classical and early medieval authors, including Aristotle, Sa’id al-Andalusi (1029–1070), Maimonides (1135–1204), and Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) (see Frost, 2019).

Initially, social complexity arose at medium latitudes, essentially a middle zone stretching from the Mediterranean through the Middle East and into South and East Asia. This was where cognitive demands were at their highest, so it is not surprising that cognitive evolution proceeded faster there.

This coevolution between culture and genes then shifted toward northwest Europe. Why? There were ecological reasons, notably desertification and salinization of farmland. The big reason, however, was that the market economy could not develop to its fullest in the middle zone. Economic activity thus remained primarily within the family and with close kin. Because northwest Europeans had a more individualistic mindset, and weaker kin relations, they were able to pursue this coevolution between the market economy and cognitive ability. It was above all the expansion of the market economy that stimulated not only economic growth but also the scientific revolution and a consequent increase in cognitive demands (Frost, 2020).

As Gregory Clark has shown, post-medieval economic growth was driven by the demographic expansion of the middle class, and this expansion shifted the gene pool toward higher cognitive ability, as well as toward lower time preference and reduced propensity toward violence.

One question: in your chart of edu pgs, medieval Romans have about the same mean cognitive ability as do late antiquity Romans. Your earlier paper (in OpenPsych), however, showed a rise in mean cognitive ability between late antiquity and the medieval period. Is this because the dataset is not the same?

References

Clark, G. (2009a). The indicted and the wealthy: surnames, reproductive success, genetic selection and social class in pre-industrial England. http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/gclark/Farewell%20to%20Alms/Clark%20-Surnames.pdf

Clark, G. (2009b). The domestication of Man: The social implications of Darwin. ArtefaCTos 2(1): 64-80. https://core.ac.uk/reader/9499470

Clark, G. (2007). A Farewell to Alms. A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Frost, P. (2019). The Original Industrial Revolution. Did Cold Winters Select for Cognitive Ability? Psych 1(1): 166-181. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych1010012

Frost, P. (2020). The large society problem in Northwest Europe and East Asia. Advances in Anthropology 10(3): 214-134. https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2020.103012

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts